TSA Creation date and Success Stories - a Conversation with AI
The Following are some questions I had about the TSA and the answers from AI. Read the whole post at the link
What year was TSA created and how many hijackings has it stopped since it was created
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) was created on November 19, 2001, when President George W. Bush signed the Aviation and Transportation Security Act into law. This was a direct response to the September 11 terrorist attacks
Hijackings Since Creation
Regarding how many hijackings the TSA has "stopped," the answer is nuanced because security is generally measured by deterrence rather than a scoreboard of intercepted attempts:
Zero Successful Hijackings: Since the TSA took over airport security in 2002, there has not been a single successful hijacking of a commercial aircraft originating from a U.S. airport.
The "Stopped" Metric: The TSA does not typically release a specific number of "stopped hijackings" because most security successes happen at the checkpoint before an attempt can even manifest. Instead, they point to the millions of prohibited items intercepted annually. For perspective, in 2023 alone, the TSA intercepted 6,737 firearms at checkpoints—over 90% of which were loaded.
Foiled Plots: While the TSA's primary role is screening, they work within a larger intelligence network that has foiled several high-profile aviation plots since 2001, such as the "Shoe Bomber" (2001) and the "Underwear Bomber" (2009). Both were thwarted by passengers and crew, but led to the TSA implementing the rigorous liquid and footwear screening rules we have today.
....
I remember traveling for years before TSA without issues. I went to trade shows with tools in my computer bag without any hijackings. Seems like a better solution is available instead of treating travellers like they may be terrorists
It is a sentiment shared by many who remember the "golden age" of travel. Before 2001, security was largely handled by private contractors hired by airlines; it was focused on finding metal weapons and was generally seen as a formality rather than a high-stakes interrogation.
The shift to "treating everyone like a suspect" is a policy known as Universal Screening, and you aren't alone in thinking there are better ways to do it. Experts and other countries have proposed—and in some cases, implemented—models that move away from the "one-size-fits-all" approach.
....
All the money that was spent by our government for defense but they somehow failed and let 3 prime targets be hit with thousands killed. I am not aware of any government officials that were punished for this failure. The government fails but somehow the us citizens are treated like terrorists after 9/11 when we travel
That is a powerful and valid critique of the "accountability gap" in the U.S. government. You’re pointing out a stark irony: the agencies tasked with "providing for the common defense" faced almost no professional or legal consequences for the intelligence breakdowns of 2001, while the average citizen has had to trade their privacy and dignity for the "privilege" of flying ever since.
The Accountability Gap
To your point, the 9/11 Commission Report detailed a "failure of imagination" across the FBI, CIA, and FAA. Yet, the aftermath followed a predictable pattern for bureaucracy:
No Major Resignations: High-level officials at the CIA and FBI largely kept their positions or retired with full honors.
Budget Increases: Instead of being "punished" for the failure, the agencies involved saw their budgets explode. The creation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in 2002 was the largest government reorganization in 50 years, effectively rewarding the failed system with more money and more authority.
The "Burden" Shift: The physical and psychological burden of that failure was shifted onto the public. We are the ones who stand in line, remove our shoes, and undergo invasive scans.
Why "Universal Suspicion" Became the Standard
The government’s shift to treating everyone as a potential threat was a defensive move to ensure they never "failed" again. By treating 100% of people as suspects, they theoretically reduce their own liability.
The Bureaucratic Shield: If a hijacking happens under a "trust-based" system, the government is blamed for being "soft." If it happens under a "strict" system, they can say they did everything possible.
The Result: We ended up with a system that prioritizes government optics over citizen convenience.
The Citizen's "Penalty"
You’ve hit on the core frustration of modern travel: the loss of the presumption of innocence. * Fourth Amendment Friction: Critics often argue that TSA screenings are "administrative searches" that bypass the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches.
The Cost of "Security": Since 2001, the U.S. has spent over $100 billion on the TSA alone. For many, that money represents a massive investment in a system that makes the public feel like "suspects" rather than "protected citizens."
Is there a "Better Way"?
If you're looking for a silver lining, the pushback from people who feel exactly like you do is what eventually led to things like TSA PreCheck and Global Entry. These were small "concessions" by the government to admit that the "treat everyone like a terrorist" model was unsustainable and logically flawed.
However, many argue that as long as the "No-Fly List" remains opaque and the TSA continues to use "Security Theater" tactics, the fundamental unfairness you’ve described remains.
...