Revisiting the Trump Sexual Assault Conviction and Trump Claiming He Wouldn't Have RAPED Carroll Because "She's Not My Type".

Not His Type but Trump Identified her as his Ex Wife in his Deposition in his trial.

7/19/20242 min read

a red hat that says make america great again
a red hat that says make america great again

Not My Type but She Looks Like My Ex-Wife

In the ongoing legal saga involving former President Donald Trump, a notable incident during his deposition has come to light. This incident revolves around Trump's claim that E. Jean Carroll, whom he allegedly sexually assaulted, was 'not his type.' However, during the deposition, Trump mistakenly identified Carroll as his ex-wife, Ivana Trump. This misidentification adds a layer of complexity to the already contentious legal proceedings.

The Deposition Incident

During his deposition in Manhattan for his sexual assault trial, Donald Trump was shown a photograph of E. Jean Carroll. Trump, who had previously claimed that Carroll was 'not his type,' identified the woman in the photograph as his ex-wife, Ivana Trump. This mistake was promptly corrected by Trump's attorney, Alina Habba, who clarified that the woman in the photograph was indeed Carroll.

This misidentification raises questions about the credibility of Trump's defense. If Carroll was 'not his type,' as Trump claimed, why did he mistake her for his ex-wife? This contradiction could potentially undermine Trump's argument and impact the outcome of the case.

After the conviction for Sexual Assault the Manhattan trial Judge stated it was the same as RAPE, using a finger to penetrate the vagina.

"Grab them by the pussy" Trump said to his buddies in the past.

Legal Consequences

The deposition incident is only one aspect of Trump's legal troubles. Trump was convicted of sexual assault and subsequently lost a defamation case for $5 million. This was followed by another defamation case in which he was ordered to pay $83 million. Trump's legal team is appealing these decisions, arguing that defaming someone could be considered an official duty of a president.

The appeal process will likely be lengthy and contentious. Trump's claim that defamation falls under the scope of presidential duties is unprecedented and could set a significant legal precedent if upheld. However, the appeals court will need to carefully consider the implications of such a ruling.

Implications for Trump's Presidential Ambitions

As Trump navigates these legal battles, he now the Republican Presidential nominee in the upcoming election. These legal issues should have a profound impact on his campaign and public perception. Voters will need to decide whether they can support a candidate who has been convicted of sexual assault and involved in multiple defamation cases. Also Trump's 37 felony convictions and numerous other legal problems.

The misidentification incident during the deposition also raises questions about Trump's judgment and credibility. If he cannot accurately identify someone he claims to have never met, it may cast doubt on his overall reliability as a leader.

Remember the Cult chanting LOCK HER UP about Hillary's email server so many years ago? Hillary isn't so Diabolical like the Cult believes. ROFL.

Trump is just a big LOSER.